Skip to main content

Editorial standards

Editorial policy and correction standard

The goal is useful product guidance that a person can verify—not a page for every keyword or a claim that a search engine must recommend us.

Maintained by Valorem AppsLast reviewed

Who publishes the work

Valorem Apps is the independent mobile-app portfolio of developer Gal Itach. ValoremAI is the related software-engineering and product-development studio. Guides, comparisons, product pages, and most app demonstrations are first-party material and say so when ownership affects a reader’s decision.

A first-party guide explains where a Valorem product may fit and where another category may be better. It is not presented as an independent review of competing products.

Sources and first-hand evidence

Product identity and availability begin with the canonical registry and the exact App Store or Google Play listing. Platform-specific claims are attached to the edition that supplied them. First-hand screenshots, workflows, examples, tool formulas, and release notes are used when they add information a generic description cannot.

External claims—such as calendar calculations, language conventions, rules, or privacy guidance—are linked to an appropriate primary or specialist source when they materially affect a decision. A provider page is not treated as proof of a different platform edition.

Dates, freshness, and uncertainty

Published and updated dates describe meaningful editorial changes, not every deployment. Store facts are point-in-time observations with a review window; stale observations are suppressed or labeled rather than presented as current.

When evidence is incomplete, the page says what is known, names the boundary, and links to the provider. Absence of an observed badge is not converted into a “no ads,” “no account,” “offline,” or “no data collection” claim.

AI assistance and human responsibility

AI tools may assist with brainstorming, organization, code, translation drafts, or editorial checks. A human owner remains responsible for factual review, product scope, language quality, accessibility, source links, and the final published wording.

The site does not create a separate AI-only version of a claim. Machine-readable catalogs and Markdown mirrors are generated from the same source contracts that drive the visible pages.

What we avoid

We do not buy organic ranking, manufacture reviews or mentions, publish fake awards or testimonials, or create doorway pages for every synonym. We avoid unsupported superlatives and high-stakes outcomes, especially for health, children, safety, education, finance, religion, and reminders.

A page earns its place when it helps someone choose, verify, use, or reject a product or tool with less uncertainty than they had before visiting.

Corrections and feedback

If a name, store link, platform fact, calculation, translation, screenshot caption, or safety boundary is wrong, send the URL and the specific correction to contact@valorem.ing. For provider-controlled facts, include the exact platform and source page.

Material corrections are recorded with the affected route and review date when a public history helps readers understand the change. A correction is not hidden by silently changing a historical article title or retaining a stale machine artifact.

Report a factual issue

Use the corrections page for the reporting path and the current public correction history.